An update on the present situation regarding work at the Glory Hole, La Boisselle

Having received numerous enquiries via our website regarding the potential for archaeological work at the Glory Hole, La Boisselle, in 2014, we wish to clarify the present situation.

Our original contract expired in late January 2014. Towards the end of the November/December 2013 working period the landowner (who is also President of the Association des Amis de l’Ilot de La Boisselle) informed us that a new contract had been prepared.

Despite a number of written requests, to date no further information regarding this document or the wishes of the Association has been received. Until written notice of the Association’s wishes have been received we will be unable to inform the DRAC Picardie (Direction régionale des affaires culturelles), the British Army, the Royal Engineers, the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC), Office National des Anciens Combattants et Victimes de Guerre (ONAC), or the general public, supporters and sponsors, of the potential for future work. When we are finally provided with a decision we will publish details on our website. We sincerely apologise to those many individuals and groups who have enquired about possible site visits.

Many people have noticed that the site has been backfilled. Over the past three years we have invested heavily in the protection of the rich variety of archaeological resources at the Glory Hole. Last summer the covers suffered serious vandalism which necessitated expensive repairs. In December, with winter weather threatening, backfilling was seen as the only protective recourse: the action was approved (and indeed suggested) by the DRAC. It may appear drastic, but it is standard professional practice for protecting archaeology against the effects of inclement weather, especially frost after rain, and solving the problem of damage by uninvited visitors. It has also resolved certain health and safety concerns relating to trenches and tunnels. The workings were all lined with geotextile before backfilling took place.

Archaeological artefacts from the excavations at the Glory Hole are located as follows:

  • The personal effects of the French soldiers (November-December 2013 dig) are in the possession of the ONAC.
  • The personal effects of the British soldiers (November-December 2013 dig) are in the possession of the CWGC.
  • The remainder of November-December 2013 finds are currently stored at the DRAC offices in Amiens, and will be delivered to the landowner when they are no longer required by the LBSG for research purposes. All other finds from previous dig periods are with the landowner or at the landowner’s preferred repository, the Somme 1916 Museum in Albert.

Allegations have been made by the landowner that she was prevented from entering the site in November/December. These allegations were made both verbally and in a Courrier Picard newspaper article dated 26 January 2014. It is a matter of great concern to us that such accusations were aired in this way, and it is with regret that we are forced to respond publically. The LBSG categorically deny them.

Given the highly sensitive nature of the work, all the LBSG requested was for 30 minutes warning before visits took place. Any access restrictions that were applied were the decision of the CWGC; they were delivered to the landowner personally by CWGC personnel who were working with us on site, not by LBSG members. Access restrictions applied only to the specially-designed shelter constructed over the working area.  A specially arranged 2-hour visit of the Association des Amis de l’Ilot de La Boisselle (including the landowner) took place on 27 November 2013.

A detailed project design had been drawn up for the November work; this had first to be agreed with the CWGC and the MoD, discussed with the ONAC, and permissions authorised by the DRAC. The project design was supplied to the proprietor and to all members of the Association des Amis de l’Ilot de La Boisselle. We are presently unable to release this document because of the sensitive nature of the work it describes. It will, we hope, eventually appear on this website.

The accusations made by the landowner in the Courrier Picard article were refuted by CIRAS (Centre Interdisciplinaire des Recherches archéologiques de la Somme) who published a response on their website: http://www.associationciras.fr/2014/01/26/fin-des-fouilles-au-glory-hole-sur-fond-de-brouille/. It noted, ‘this article is the conclusion of a campaign of disinformation conducted by the site owner’, and, ‘the excavations conducted by the team led by Peter Barton were carried out with scientific rigour and professionalism; this was recognized by all, including the DRAC.’

Last year the LBSG supplied the landowner with projected plans for potential archaeological, genealogical and archival work up to 2016 – which, given the highly complex archaeological circumstances presented by the site, was the limit of our predictive skills. The plans complemented the detailed original Project Design drawn up in March 2011, a document that was agreed to and translated (into French) by the landowner.

Questions have been asked about funding sources. Archaeological ‘hardware’ of all kinds is very kindly sponsored by a large number of companies and the Royal Engineers. The only grant funding received by the LBSG has come from the CIRAS, who very kindly offered funds in both 2012 and 2013. All other monies are raised by LBSG fundraising efforts in the UK, some of which are illustrated on this website. The funds donated on site are occasionally sufficient to pay for meals for the team. All those who work with the project on and off the site – including LBSG committee members – are unpaid volunteers. The three-week excavations in November/December 2013 cost the LBSG £20,000.

La Boisselle Study Group, 7 April 2014

10 Responses to An update on the present situation regarding work at the Glory Hole, La Boisselle

  1. Monday 9th June2014
    Jeremy
    Very sad to hear what has been happening at the site. Myself and the group from Liverpool that I took over around about three years ago and you, being a (Chelsea Fan) took great delight in meeting us and giving us a tour of the area and explaining in great detail the events of what took place. At a later date on our next visit we were standing talking to Peter when one of your team came out of the tunnel carrying some items that he had just come across(Petrol can)(Candles) also some old nails and tools when you think that some person had taken them down there ninety odd years before and now saw the light of day for the first time. This fantastic work that you are all doing must not be lost to the future generation. Once again very sad hope all can be sorted soon. wishing you Peter and the team all the best.

  2. So sorry to hear of the difficulties, we were hoping to donate again after the autumn event this year, keep us in the loop please

  3. Sad to hear what has happened to the Glory Hole.
    I hope the situation is resolved soon.

  4. What is the current situation as at 11/5/14 have you any updates to the statement of 7/4/14 in particular the intended future of the site

    • Dear Norman,
      Many thanks for your post. There is no update to the last statement posted. When we have further details we will update the News section of the website.
      Sincerely,
      Jeremy Banning (on behalf of the La Boisselle Study Group)

  5. I agree totally with Gene’s comments above.
    Our small party of S.E.N. students also had the opportunity to visit the tunnels two years ago. It takes a lot to engage with these challenging students but Jonathan did an excellent talk pitched at the correct level for the students. They still talk about the visit two years later.
    In this age of interactive computer displays etc, actually being “on the ground”, (or more precisely under it in this case), still has the greatest impact. I hope you can resolve your problems quickly and the people involved recognise that the educational impact this site is huge and should not be withheld from future generations.
    Thank you to all LBSG members who over the past years have assisted our groups and made this site available to all.

    Allan Douglas, UK

  6. Such a worthwhile historical project was being undertaken by volunteers. Sincerely hope the issues can be resolved and your important work can continue. Ann, Watford, UK

  7. Thanks for the update news of the LBSG.
    When I read your article, I stumbled upon the following information:

    ….”Until written notice of the Association’s wishes have been received we will be unable to inform the DRAC Picardie (Direction régionale des affaires culturelles), the British Army, the Royal Engineers, the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC), Office National des Anciens Combattants et Victimes de Guerre (ONAC), or the general public, supporters and sponsors, of the potential for future work….”

    I would like to understand your motives why the LBSG does not include the “Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge” (the German equivalent to CWGC) in the above listed organizations who work on behalf of the German Government and will rebury any German dead found on the premises. I know that a German soldier was already discovered and most likely there are more such finds when excavation work continues in the future .
    I also noticed in the news article about the precise disposition of the relevant personal effects from the found soldiers. Did I over read who is in the possession of the German soldier’s personal effects?
    Your answer will be much appreciated.
    Egbert, Germany

    • Dear Sir,

      Thank you for your enquiry.
      The required protocols regarding the reporting of human remains has been made very clear to the LBSG by the several authorities: we first inform the local Gendarmerie, followed immediately by the CWGC and the ONAC. Together, they decide how remains are recovered, and also make the necessary representations to other authorities, one of which is the VDK. We are presently preparing the archaeological and anthropological reports, the results of which cannot be released until permission is given by the various authorities.
      It is important to be aware that as a result of the severity of the fighting at the Glory Hole, there are small bone fragments everywhere. In this particular case the remains consisted of a small portion of an individual found amongst a mass of barbed wire. The potential nationality was indicated by the design of the fragmented remains of a boot; there were no personal effects present.

      Yours faithfully,
      Jeremy Banning
      La Boisselle Study Group

  8. Such a shame that people cannot see the importance of the work being done at the site.
    I was fortunate to be able to visit and enter the tunnels two years ago, the highlight of
    my trip.

    I hope the situation can be resolved and this important work can continue.

    Thanks to all of the LBSG members who worked so hard on the project.

    Gene Feeney,USA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *